Yes... I didn't see it that way. I was more on Postfix to apply the bcc_maps rules based on the sender's external addresses. I had already tried some rules based on disregarding emails with local recipients, but there may be a mixture of local and external ones in the same email, and it didn't worked.
I am not really keen on adding more processes to the mail system (you know, the more processes you have the higher chance for problems ;-) ) but I'll take a look at the proxy you have suggested. It looks promising. Thanks indeed. On 5 January 2015 at 14:38, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote: > > Greetings > Koldo Navarro: > > thanks for your answer, but copy depends only on sender. All outgoing > > emails must be copied, regardless the recipient. > > So it depends on sender *and* destination (you want to copy > all remote mail from a specific sender). > > In that case, you need the second part of my reply, repeated below: > > When the copy must depend on both the sender *and* the destination, > then you need an external solution: > > - A dummy SMTP-based content filter that splits the mail stream, > for example based on smtpprox from http://bent.latency.net/smtpprox/ > > - A Milter that selectively adds the carbon-copy recipient. Milters > are available in Python, Perl, and other languages. > > Wietse >
