On 11/23/2014 2:02 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:23:55AM -0500, Deeztek Support wrote:
Any thoughts on this?
I have no comment on the irrelevant info I did not ask for. You
could start by answering the questions I asked in my previous
message.
is there a requirement to be difficult when someone is asking a very
relevant question just not the way you want the question to be asked.
Did I stumble into Jeopardy and didn't say the magic words "what is?" or
something?
You said:
cat > issuer.pem <<EOF
I don't know what that means. It means absolutely nothing to me seeing
that I have no clue what the "issuer.pem" is and where to get it.
then I said:
I guess I'm confused about something. Below are the relevant entries in
my /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt file for google. This was obtained
by running the "openssl s_client -CAfile ca.pem -starttls smtp
-showcerts -connect alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com:25":
Which clearly indicates that I got the public keys from the google's
smtp server. Is that not legitimate? If not, maybe you can say that
instead of ignoring me and then making snarky remarks when pressing for
an answer.
