Hi, The problem was due to a bug in our mail client which caused the attachments not be shown.
Thanks for your help. On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 2:51 PM, li...@rhsoft.net <li...@rhsoft.net> wrote: > > Am 09.11.2014 um 09:42 schrieb Mohammad Isargar: > >> I'm using Postfix 2.9.6 in Debian Wheezy. >> >> My problem is: if I send an email to some invalid address of another >> domain, the bounce returned by Postfix does NOT contain the original >> invalid recipient address >> > > it even includes the orginal message > > I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not >> be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. >> > > look at that attachment > > : host >> gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com >> <http://gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com>[74.125.136.27] >> said: 550-5.1.1 The email account >> that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try 550-5.1.1 >> double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or 550-5.1.1 >> unnecessary spaces. Learn more at 550 5.1.1 >> http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=<some url >> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - gsmtp (in reply to RCPT TO command) >> >> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% >> > > normally *after* that block comes a "Reporting-MTA" like this > > Reporting-MTA: dns; ************** like this > X-THELOUNGE-MTA-Queue-ID: 3jbCRs1QdKz2q > X-THELOUNGE-MTA-Sender: rfc822; h.rei...@thelounge.net > Arrival-Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 12:15:21 +0100 (CET) > > Final-Recipient: rfc822; sdffdgdfg...@gmail.com > Original-Recipient: rfc822;sdffdgdfg...@gmail.com > Action: failed > Status: 5.1.1 > Remote-MTA: dns; gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach > does > not exist. Please try 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email > address for typos or 550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at 550 > 5.1.1 > http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=6596 > a3si24316841wjx.130 - gsmtp > > Therefore, the sender can't figure out what has been the original >> recipient. >> > > see above > > By the way, what's wrong with my Postfix that does NOT mention the >> invalid address and just tells: "could not be delivered to one or more >> recipients" >> > > i doubt that what you posted was the *complete* bounce and pretty sure you > *and* the user premature stop reading which is a pandemic disease over many > years in context of bounces >
