On Oct 20, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:01:51AM -0500, Larry Stone wrote: > >>> You should no longer need to specify "-lresolv" (though it won't >>> fix this problem), and should never have needed to specify "-arch x86_64?. >> >> Hmmm, that '-arch x86_64' was in a note you (Viktor) posted on 5/11/14 in >> the topic "Client side DANE - minimum openssl version". > > Only because I failed to prune some inessential, but likely harmless > details from the HOWTO in question: > > http://diymacserver.com/mail/snow-leopard/compiling-postfix-in-64-bits/ > > which is still showing wrong usage of "-L/path" to this day. > I’ve moved beyond that site, which seems to no longer keeping up with the OS X changes, in large part thanks to the help you’ve provided. >> with or without the -arch x86_64... > > The target architecture defaults to the machine archicture. You > only need "-arch" when building for a different machine type than > the one you're using. The more you post about these things, the more I learn. So a very sincere "Thank You" for all you contribute to Postfix. -- Larry Stone lston...@stonejongleux.com http://www.stonejongleux.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature