-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Viktor Dukhovni wrote on 15/10/2014 19:58:
> This might break support for older versions of Outlook/Outlook Express
> (Windows XP?).
That leads to another issue, probably a bit offtopic: is better a good
backward compatibility or a good security?
I know that the best answer is "it depends on who your clients are", but if we
draw a line on the backward compatibility probably we gain on stability and
security.
I read the details of LibreSSL project and the spaghetti-code story of OpenSSL.
In essence: is the price we are paying for backward compatibility becoming a
bit too high?
Ciao,
luigi
- --
/
+--[Luigi Rosa]--
\
There was an IT guy called Rosa
Who was well-known in Zaragoza
His passion for pork
required no fork
Swine fainted if Luis got closer!
--Paolo Attivissimo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUPrczAAoJEO5WT/qgw4yKDysP/Rx20VV2hRC5nWdt61AZu1ys
lJI/lry3dqIiSJ7Vp5IHiPnXOwZIqQNVkWOq+gKtk2lKe7dTF0gVha8izq9scseI
eLQfMGA1qoGZBisEt/Fjh4F5lyNxjnyS7oy7X7t3QnLDQVodJjHMmJUyZsXai4YD
ZESmwU+rjHLcGlXsw0+OpLjZaL68Pm+10LbJusjKM7jS7xM8gDi5VJy9LVtL65QC
zBF4IWAsiw0zjPCNu2ltKPr0WMwhsarJoAJtADLN1xvKe8ZofxO7Z0p6FI+t8E0Y
CngfrkCagVCLziAMf0ulfomxMOy0NHuwCObLJQTvET5ytrC43PFGLMpwOF1DsWNT
aujtuWh4jWmUMhv3v83k22Rdbk6lH4qMCTaZmnr5wB/wPGrVBx48wXizSyTwSDpp
eC4XIUWunXHdsKuGP1KM9riBNmgM5Of3dy05laKkm+J/+j0LFjQfLYwBODvBPAKs
parizGrnvYSORD2Ev4ZZPQjaI0uF8pKd3je3XQmNCh+14+GmjVb7yyVl3uW5Evx9
GRSfjQoIScPRbWnudRZ62w2P/j5H/npGq1xlKnFpUHVS+x1VjIkfmnBrWv8gb7OC
telKbPZSe+QG888sC1nEzA1LyVMdF64gXzFMMH8oLDaCYHUfdY3vIXWBVw/ivd4U
lg/vxVEtti5CyEdwnHjI
=RAMa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
