Henrik Larsson:
> On 03-10-2014 23:27, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 11:19:24PM +0200, Henrik Larsson wrote:
> >
> >> If you reject a message in helo, sender or recipient restrictions, the
> >> specific restriction is shown in the reject message as shown below:
> >> 554 5.7.1 <helo.domain.local>: Helo command rejected: Rejected
> >> 554 5.7.1 <sender@domain.local>: Sender address rejected: Rejected
> >> 554 5.7.1 <recipient@domain.local>: Recipient address rejected: Rejected
> >>
> >> Is it possible to suppress this, so the error message will only contain my
> >> defined error code and message?
> > No.
> >
> A lot of users go to great lengths to use restrictions to block spam.
> Why would you reveal specifically in which restriction the message was
> blocked? At least I would prefer not to.
Can you show quantitative evidence that this would actually make a
measurable difference in the volume of unwanted email, or is this
just about warm fuzzy feelings? There are better ways to achieve
the latter than tweaking an email delivery system. Throw another
log on the fire.
Wietse
