Dear Viktor, you're probably right but that would be one of possible
ways to do auto-responses. However in this case the autoresponser is
not the clue. The original_recipient should work as expected,
shouldn't it ? I tried to use no_address_mappings in master.cf and
autoresponder_destination_recipient_limit=1 as was written in postfix
documentation but without success. I can't find other options :(
2014-10-01 14:47 GMT+02:00 Viktor Dukhovni [via Postfix]
<ml-node+s1071664n71295...@n5.nabble.com>:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:56:48AM -0700, Artyum wrote:
>
>> Thank you for notice Bill. I'll try paste all again as text:
>>
>> I noticed that in my postfix configuration there is a problem with
>> ${original_recipient} which is not set or is overwritten by
>> ${recipient}
>> My master.cf is below. The problem is that in the autoresponder -r
>> ${original_recipient} is equal to ${recipient}.
>> Because of that, if user address belongs to a group (aliases) then if
>> sender sends message to this group then the autoresponder responds
>> from uses address. I want autoresponder only replay if the mail was
>> sent directly to the user (not throught alias).
>> I'd like to know the ${original_recipient} to check if the mail was
>> sent directly to user or to alias group.
>
> IIRC for auto-responses, the correct way to determine whether a message was
> sent "directly", is to parse the To: and Cc: headers. The envelope will
> often contain the user name in original-recipient even in mail via lists.
>
> --
> Viktor.
>
>
> ________________________________
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-original-recipient-tp71161p71295.html
> To unsubscribe from Postfix original_recipient, click here.
> NAML
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-original-recipient-tp71161p71296.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
