why respond off-list? not able to handle a MUA but maintain mailservers.....
Am 25.06.2014 13:27, schrieb Thomas R.: >> why not change the order? >> >> a contentfilter is anyways expensive and should be the last one >> nad so only face messages which made it trough all the cheaper >> tests and filters > > I'm not aware of any way of having a before-queue filter run *after* a milter *both* are before-queue and so only the order matters http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html > and still have it run before-queue. I think the only way to do that is to > have > it as an after-queue filter and then lose the ability to REJECT during the > SMTP transaction without creating backscatter. *any* filter has to be before-queue noweher did i say anything else > That is the situation I'm currently in though. I just feel as if rejecting > spam at the SMTP transaction is more > responsible than blackholing it after. Opinions differ on this. where did i say anything else? > Other suggestions welcome. > > Aside, bogofilter is actually a remarkably lightweight and fast spam filter. > It can scan and classify a folder of > over 2000 mails in a couple of seconds. Of course there will be overhead > because it doesn't run as a daemon. in any case it's more expensive compared to non-content-filters
