remove
Warm Regards, *Dhiraj Kumar* Team Wahix India ------------------------------ M : 0091-900-4642799 / 0091-889-8814406 E : i...@wahix.com | W : www.wahix.com ------------------------------ *The sky is never too high to touch, if we scale it together* This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. *Preserve Trees - Do not print this mail unless necessary!* On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:16 PM, li...@rhsoft.net <li...@rhsoft.net> wrote: > > > Am 23.06.2014 13:27, schrieb Edgar Pettijohn: > > On 06/23/2014 01:27 AM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > >> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 05:50:54 +0000 > >> Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:04:57AM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > >>>> - smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks > >>>> permit_sasl_authenticated reject_unauth_destination > >>>> + smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, > >>>> permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination > >>> These differ only in the use of commas, which are equivalent to > >>> whitespace in this context, i.e. they may aid readability but are > >>> entirely optional. This change makes NO difference. You changed > >>> something else that really solved the problem. > >> The OP didn't really give enough context but he also changed > >> the order of the two lines. > >> > > I was aware that there should be no diff between "," and " ", but I had > > tried everything I could think of. I didn't write down the error > > Thunderbird was giving me > > in any case: screenshot > > > but it made me believe > > it's frustrating enough that users complain with reports > "said something similar to" but if one controls the server > and the client i don't get why not take a screenshot and > look at the serverlog from the same moment instead "believe" > > the change you posted changes nothing and is misleading for > anybody who finds that thread later - if it is SASl related > than the logs would have been clear > > however, a subject "thunderbird" makes no sense > > >
