motty cruz wrote: > Hello, recently I am getting loads of spam, more than usual. I have the > following RBLs. > > reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org > <http://b.barracudacentral.org>, > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org <http://zen.spamhaus.org>, > reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net <http://bl.spamcop.net>, > reject_rbl_client all.spamrats.com <http://all.spamrats.com>
A little overaggressive for my taste. Your system, your rules. > any recommendation? > > Bayes Headers: I think you mean SpamAssassin/Amavis headers. You should probably take further followup to the SA users list. > X-Spam-Flag: NO____ > X-Spam-Score: 3.147____ > X-Spam-Level: ***____ > X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5.3____ > tests=[BAYES_99=4.5, BAYES_999=0.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,____ > MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RDNS_NONE=2.013, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01,____ > URIBL_BLACK=1.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO=-6] autolearn=no Well, USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO=-6 isn't helping this particular message get tagged as spam.... Without that hit, the message would have scored ~9, well over your threshold of 5.3. -kgd
