On 04/03/2014 10:24, Peer Heinlein wrote: > And: It's not a spurprise and not a "man made problem", but an > interesting new use-case where we can provide additional mailadresses > with TLS-encrypted SMTP (next hop)-transfer to/from the recipient's > provider.
Hello, just for the sake of curiosity, what is the problem this is trying to solve? I don't see what you gain having the possibility to enforce TLS transport when this can be done only for an (unknown) fraction of the delivery path. Evidently, I'm missing something. Thank you. Best, Daniele
