Freek Dijkstra:
> > The way I read your proposal is that Postfix would only pretend
> > that it supporMts SMTPUTF8, without doing the 99% of the work.
>
> That would of course be ludicrous, and it never occurred to me that my
> original email could be interpreted that way. I apologize for the confusion.
...
> I understand that this functionality is just a tip of the iceberg. I had
> thought about how this effectively changes the API interface to other
> mail components (such as spam filters, or procmail-like delivery tools)
> which may now expect ASCII-encoded input. Your list is clearly a lot
> longer than that.
Indeed. SMTPUTF8 support involves more than the 1% that says "I can
do SMTPUTF8" in the EHLO handshake. There is a whole list of RFCs
that need to be supported first.
Wietse
