On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:55 AM, li...@rhsoft.net <li...@rhsoft.net> wrote: > > > Am 23.11.2013 20:18, schrieb tejas sarade: > > OK, got it. > > > > Add the following line in main.cf <http://main.cf> file to add new recipient restriction which will use pcre table. > > > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access pcre:/etc/postfix/pcre_recipients, permit_mynetworks, > > reject_unauth_destination > > have fun with "reject_unauth_destination" too late and
Only if he is using smtpd_helo_restrictions. > "check_recipient_access" says "PERMIT" instead "DUNNO" Where exactly it says PERMIT?. He is not using smtpd_helo_restrictions. The default configuration was smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination You didn't seem to have problem with that. Just when I suggested him to add one extra lookup table for recipient check you are pointing this out. You can start the new thread about how default configuration is extremely dangerous. Just don't hijack this this one. > a major mistake and becuase it is made too often smtpd_relay_restrictions > was included in the lastest releases > > http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html#danger The link you have given is specific to configuration where check_helo_access evaluated before reject_unauth_destination. Condition specified in the example is not the same here.
