Jeremy Bowen skrev den 2013-11-14 22:38:
Thanks also to the other respondents. I wasn't explicitly
"whitelisting" these messages, although I accept that using DKIM to
lower the spam scores had essentially the same effect. I've updated my
SpamAssassin config accordingly.
i see now after i did research on it
https://www.google.dk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&cad=rja&ved=0CFYQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmail-archives.apache.org%2Fmod_mbox%2Fspamassassin-users%2F200609.mbox%2F%253C200609121659.08039.Mark.Martinec%2Bsa%40ijs.si%253E&ei=oESFUrqMCsjKsgbM-4HQDw&usg=AFQjCNEYomxu4ry8eL33mNLQIvjItdRlMw&sig2=8ykVHO8zjq28uog0EjPbEA&bvm=bv.56343320,d.Yms
sorry for long url, you are using a depricated plugin in spamassassin,
only use dkim, not both
default score for DK-WHITELIST is -1.5 (that was not using
WHITELIST_FROM_DKIM in local.cf)
Not sure why my bayesian classifier hasn't picked up on these as yet. I
guess the contents are sufficiently small and different for them to
make it difficult to catch, or maybe I need to re-train my system.
there is just a danger here with ns blocking in mta stage that it could
find a domain name that does not spam, and then you will reject it ?
