Hi, On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:20 PM, /dev/rob0 <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 08:13:46PM -0400, Alex wrote: >> I have an fc18 box with postfix-2.9.6 and have configured >> postscreen and sqlgrey to help with spam. > > I don't understand why you'd want both postscreen and sqlgrey. If > you're okay with the delays, postscreen can provide them (albeit, > lacking the intelligence of whitelisting in released Postfix > versions; 2.11 will be/is a must-have upgrade for the DNSWL > whitelisting feature.)
I should have known postscreen would do this. But does it really do all that sqlgrey can do? I like the shared database across multiple hosts feature. We have a few servers, and it's great to be able to share the whitelist/spam between them. I don't recall seeing anything about delays in the postscreen config. I'd appreciate any further info you have on this. I could also upgrade to 2.11 if necessary. Do you have specifics on this DNSWL feature yet? >> I have postscreen_dnsbl_threshold set to 3, and have weighted >> several RBLs, and dnsblog logs the hits, but they don't seem to >> be being rejected: ... > ... minus two is two! Threshold not met. :( Perhaps you want to raise > the score for list.dnswl.org .0 to -1? Ah, not sure how I missed that. I think I'll lower the score, as you suggest. > Aside: I have actually thought about using list.dnswl.org 127.0.15.0 > (email marketers, trust level "none") as a +1 DNSBL. No, I would not, > but it's fun to think about. :) That is interesting. I'd love to see the list of who's on that list so I can decide whether that would be good for us. I hadn't realized there was a specific list classifying marketers. Thanks again, as always. Alex
