Am 18.10.2013 23:52, schrieb Dominik George: > $ host 2a00:1828:2000:239::2 > 2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.9.3.2.0.0.0.0.2.8.2.8.1.0.0.a.2.ip6.arpa > domain name pointer shore.naturalnet.de. > > $ host shore.naturalnet.de > shore.naturalnet.de has address 89.238.64.147 > shore.naturalnet.de has IPv6 address 2a00:1828:2000:239::2 > >> * verify that *all* matchs > > I do not see what should not match ;). > > Further: > > $ dig naturalnet.de MX > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > naturalnet.de. 3600 IN MX 30 shore.naturalnet.de. > > $ dig shore.naturalnet.de AAAA > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > shore.naturalnet.de. 3521 IN AAAA 2a00:1828:2000:239::2 > > $ dig naturalnet.de TXT > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > naturalnet.de. 3591 IN TXT "v=spf1 mx ~all"
if i would be you i would *not* use "v=spf1 mx ~all" until we switched to declare ip-addresses in SPF i noted repeatly negative results from several testing tools online, maybe caused by the additional ookups needed for MX to A/AAA and IP after switch to ipv4:<network> i *never* faced any fasle positive rhsoft.net. 86400 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:91.118.73.0/24 ip4:89.207.144.27 ip4:84.113.45.179 -all" rhsoft.net. 86400 IN SPF "v=spf1 ip4:91.118.73.0/24 ip4:89.207.144.27 ip4:84.113.45.179 -all" here you go for ipv6 http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax#ip6
