On Wed, September 18, 2013 2:54 pm, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 9/17/2013 10:40 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>> reject_non_fqdn_sender, reject_non_fqdn_recipient, >>> reject_invalid_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_hostname, >> This should have blocked the example message, but did not. Why? > He's using Postfix 2.6.6. The parms in his current config that would > have triggered are for 2.2 or older, thus ignored I assume. He should be > using > reject_invalid_helo_hostname reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname > which should trigger on this. I've updated the syntax as per above, BUT, my fault was that the address in question was exempted in "recipient_no_checks", for other users, the old-syntax was working, now updated thanks again for helping, everyone --------------------- smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated, permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination, check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/recipient_no_checks, reject_non_fqdn_sender, reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_invalid_helo_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname, reject_unknown_sender_domain, reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname, reject_unlisted_recipient, check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/freemail_access, check_recipient_access pcre:/etc/postfix/recipient_checks.pcre, check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/helo_checks, check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_checks, check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_checks, check_client_access pcre:/etc/postfix/client_checks.pcre, reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, reject_rhsbl_client dbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rhsbl_sender dbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client psbl.surriel.com, reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, reject_rhsbl_sender dsn.rfc-ignorant.org, check_policy_service inet:127.0.0.1:10031, permit
