On 16.08.2013, at 08:50, Titanus Eramius <tita...@aptget.dk> wrote: [DNS]
> I tend to simply use "v=spf1 mx -all" since my setup is simple, but you > can see the entire syntax here http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax Hmm, I used to have just that configuration in my DNS for more than a year, but very recently I got some rejections upon delivery of mails from my published mx records (mx1.my-domain.tld and mx2.my-domain.tld) in DNS stating: | An SPF-enabled mail server rejected a message from a mail server claiming | to be mx1.my-domain.tld. | | An SPF-enabled mail server received a message from mx1.my-domain.tld (1.2.3.4) | from a mail server claiming to be mx1.my-domain.tld. | | The domain mx1.my-domain.tld has not published an SPF policy. It is possible | that the receiving mail server refuses all mail from domains that do not have | an SPF policy. I do understand http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax that the "mx" in "v=spf1 mx -all" will tell: "Accept mail from *any* published mx of a given domain", right? For he time being (before I really do understand SPF) I'm back to run DNS without SPF, shrug. Regards, Michael
