On Aug 7, 2013, at 12:15, John Allen <j...@klam.ca> wrote:

> On 07/08/2013 2:09 AM, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
>> On Aug 7, 2013, at 02:32, John Allen <j...@klam.ca> wrote:
>> 
>>> root@bilbo:~# postconf -nf
>> [snip]
>> 
>>> smtp_tls_cert_file = /root/ssl/certs/KLaM_Mail.pem
>>> smtp_tls_key_file = /root/ssl/private/KLaM_Mail.key
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_tls_cert_file
>> 
>> Are you sure you need those there?
>> 
>> Have a look at your own config, and look up every setting in the
>> documentation. Ask yourself if there are good reasons you are
>> overriding the default, and whether your custom setting still makes
>> sense given the recommendations from the documentation.
>> 
> I am not sure. One of the problems we have is that a many of our clients work 
> force are "road warriors".  While SASL allows us to confirm who is calling it 
> does not protect the content from snooping, whereas TLS does. As some of the 
> Far eastern countries are not averse to pilfering ideas we think this is 
> worth while. However, suggestions for alternatives are welcome.

Have you read the documentation? I don't think you have. The 
'smtp_tls_cert_file' setting is for outgoing connections only, as in, 
your server sending to other servers.

Has nothing to do with road warriors, and unless you have an upstream 
relay that requires a client certificate to send mail, you should 
probably stick with the recommended defaults.

Mvg,
Joni

Reply via email to