On 06/13/2013 09:02 PM, Ravindra Gupta // Viva wrote:
Dear Wietse,
So how we will resolve the issue. Please let me know for your valuable
suggestion.
As your log clearly shows, the OTHER SIDE of the SMTP conversation tells
you this.
If this other side is a receiving SMTP *server*, then they are rejecting
your message.
If, as Wietse suggested, the other side is a virus/spam gateway on YOUR
side, then this gateway is broken or misconfigured in some way (since it
should probably not reject your own messages.)
Regardless, it is a proper 5xx response, telling postfix to bounce the
message.
Only the OTHER SIDE can shed ligt on whether or not this was in error,
or in fact the desired outcome.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org
<mailto:wie...@porcupine.org>> wrote:
Ravindra Gupta // Viva:
> Jun 12 20:29:27 ems31 postfix/smtp[1816]: CC78D22400E:
to=<test.example.com <http://test.example.com>>,
> relay=imap.eemail.example.com
<http://imap.eemail.example.com>[10.0.0.125]:25, delay=0.86,
> delays=0.01/0/0.42/0.42, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host
> imap.eemail.example.com
<http://imap.eemail.example.com>[10.0.0.125] said: 550 Action not
taken (in reply to
> end of DATA command))
Are your SMTP connections intercepted by an anti-virus system?
Wietse
--
J.
