On 10/06/13 03:11, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 03:07:59AM +1000, Nikolas Kallis wrote:
Is using 'reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname' and
'reject_invalid_helo_hostname' even neccessary when using
'reject_unknown_helo_hostname'?
You seem to have decided that the client HELO name is a silver
bullet against spam and the evils of RFC non-conformance.
You're wrong.
Since you already know what you're doing, and don't need any advice,
there is not much point in continuing this thread. Good luck.
LOL. You are a fuckin retard.
