On 22 May 2013, at 14:33 , Stan Hoeppner <s...@hardwarefreak.com> wrote:
> I'll make an educated guess that many folks here have configured > postscreen simply because it was/is "the new thing", without considering > whether they -needed- it or not. Many have run into the same address > based whitelisting problem mentioned here, and either ditched > postscreen, or spent hours/days trying to tweak it just right. I'm one of those. I don't NEED it, but it has reduced the load on my hardware significantly because far less mail is hitting spamd. -- In the words of one of the founding Igors: 'We belong dead? Ecthcuthe me? Where doeth it thay "we"?'
