On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 03:16:28PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2013-05-02 9:15 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > >Am 02.05.2013 14:08, schrieb Charles Marcus: > >>>On 2013-05-01 6:31 PM, Ben WIlliams<benwilli...@joobworld.com> wrote: > >>>>>The version is postfix 2.3.3. > >>>Really? 7 yrs old, unsupported since the last patch (2.3.19) in 2009... > >stoneold yes, but unsupported not really > > Unsupported according to the postfix site... > > >[root@vmware-recovery:~]$ rpm -qa | grep postfix > >postfix-2.3.3-6.el5 > > > >rpm -q --changelog postfix > >* Tue Jul 03 2012 Jaroslav ?karvada<jskar...@redhat.com> - 2:2.3.3-6 > > So he should have asked on the redhat list...
Let's not engage in sophistry. More to the point even if Redhat continue to fix some bugs in Postfix 2.3, other issues are resolved in later releases through structural improvements that are difficult to backport. MTA administrators should deploy Postfix releases that are still supported upstream (http://www.postfix.org/download.html). -- Viktor.
