LuKreme:
> In our previous episode (Saturday, 06-Apr-2013), Wietse Venema said:
> > LuKreme:
> >>
> >> I've just updated my postfix install to 2.8 patch 14 (from 2.7)
> >> and am looking into enabling postscreen. I've read the
> >> http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html document, and it
> >> looks like I should replace my old rbi checks with the new
> >> postscreen_dnsbl_sites value, but what about some of the other
> >> checks?
> >
> > I suggest you don't change your existing spamblocking features.
>
> Really? What is the advantage of polling the RBL at spamhaus again?
You're not polling it again. The information is cached in the DNS
server. And in the case that the DNSBL lookup result came too late
for postscreen, it may still arrive in time for smtpd(8).
> And aren't reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname and
> reject_unlisted_sender redundant in smtpd_recipient_restrictions?
Please RTFM. postscreen doe snot implement every smtpd feature.
Wietse
