On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:19:52PM +0000, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote:

> I have another question: what happens if a client is whitelisted AND it fails
> SASL authentication?

The whitelist only applies to authenticated users. Unauthenticated users
are treated like everyone else.

> I suppose that the following directives are evaluated, aren't they?
> So, in such cases, there is a query to the rbl, another (failed) check for
> SASL authentication (if the IP is not listed), and the final reject due to
> reject_unauth_destination.
> 
> So, is it correct to create the file /etc/postfix/whitelist_client.cidr with
> entries like:
> 192.0.2.1/32    permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
> 
> The additional reject should prevent further evaluation of restrictions 
> outside
> (and following) the access table.

You're working too hard, the suggested settings should work just fine.

-- 
        Viktor.

Reply via email to