On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:19:52PM +0000, Fabio Sangiovanni wrote: > I have another question: what happens if a client is whitelisted AND it fails > SASL authentication?
The whitelist only applies to authenticated users. Unauthenticated users are treated like everyone else. > I suppose that the following directives are evaluated, aren't they? > So, in such cases, there is a query to the rbl, another (failed) check for > SASL authentication (if the IP is not listed), and the final reject due to > reject_unauth_destination. > > So, is it correct to create the file /etc/postfix/whitelist_client.cidr with > entries like: > 192.0.2.1/32 permit_sasl_authenticated,reject > > The additional reject should prevent further evaluation of restrictions > outside > (and following) the access table. You're working too hard, the suggested settings should work just fine. -- Viktor.