On 2013-01-27 09:15:03 (-0500), John Allen <j...@klam.ca> wrote: > The jungle drums has been rumbling about SPF2, as a result I started > to do some reading up on the new "standard". > > So far I seem to have found two camps those for it and those against. > From my reading to date those against seem to "winning". > It appears to be a Microsoft experiment, is this true? if so > should I ignore it (at least for now)? > The "standard" has NOT been adopted. again is this true? > > Bottom line should I be working on implementing sender-id? > > JohnA >
SenderID is incorrectly named SPF2 as it is not a real succesion to SPF. According to IETF RFC4406 this was defined in 2006 and the RFC and affiliated documents describe mismatches and possible problems between the two. That being said, this is not a Postfix topic and other lists may be more appropriate if you want to pursue. For example the amavis-users or IETF discussion list(s).
