Thanks, I'm in the process of testing those suggested applications! On Jan 17, 2013, at 7:07 AM, DTNX Postmaster <postmas...@dtnx.net> wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2013, at 09:25, Jamie Griffin wrote: > >> * Ned Slider <n...@unixmail.co.uk> [2013-01-17 04:25:04 +0000]: >> >>> On 16/01/13 22:20, Erwan David wrote: >>>> Le 16/01/2013 23:17, Terry Gilsenan a écrit : >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix- >>>>>> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of TFML >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2013 7:55 AM >>>>>> To: Postfix users >>>>>> Subject: Recommendations for antivirus >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm running a server on average week we receive 14,000, send 19,000, >>>>>> and in total deferred/bounced/rejected 5,000 -- Can you guys recommend >>>>>> a good antivirus that will work well with postfix. Meaning efficient in >>>>>> processing emails without dropping them into oblivion or kill the >>>>>> server CPU and/or Memory? Any suggestions will be fantastic! >>>>>> >>>>> I recommend Amavisd-new and clam. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> You may also use clamav as a milter. >>>> >>> >>> Another recommendation for ClamAV. >>> >>> As ClamAV is used predominantly in mail setups, their signature >>> database seems to do fairly well against email-borne threats. >>> Further, it's easy to create and add your own signatures allowing >>> you to respond immediately to an outbreak rather than waiting for >>> signatures to get added to official updates. >> >> clamav with Sanesecurity signatures - search google for them. easy to >> install. > > We use ClamAV here as well with clamav-milter, although we found the > Sanesecurity signatures to be too strict to use for straight rejection. > YMMV, of course, be sure to at least test :-) > > Cya, > Jona >
