On 01/14/2013 04:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.01.2013 01:23, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
Oh, my wife is regularly insulted by the spam she gets. It would really bring
some peace in the house if she no
longer saw ANY spam, and I did the checking once a week of a different mail
account if there was something she
should see...
this all is way off-topic here
According to spamassasin list posts on this subject, it is the MTA's job
to do the rewriting.
BUT REALLY: no longer see any spam is naive
In my case, I will see it, but in a separate account. I won't bore the
list here for the policy reasons for it. For my wife it is personal, and
she could care less on what she is missing. This way, I can review her
spam and make sure that she does not miss something important. Maybe
naive, but my wife for over 35 years.
if you need best possible spam-filtering with as less as possible
work you need to take money in your hand and bouy some applicance
like Barracuda Spamfirewall with at least hourly updates of signatures
I have the spam filtering working well enough; don't need no fishes. It
does a good job of tagging emails as spam. There is a policy reason for
moving them to a special account.
maintain this by yourself results in way too much false positives or
spam passing through your filters
I am already doing the filtering and watching lots of messages go to
spam and every so often, when I need to search for a message, I search
junk and trash, and there it is. I get maybe 1 important false postive
per 10,000 spams.
