Marcin Owsiany:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 05:45:57PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > In that case, a burst of 1s would still be undesirable, so one would
> > have to be able to specify 0 (no caching) while the default would
> > remain at 30s.
>
> Right.
>
> I hope that disabling caching altogether would not affect performance
> too much. Perhaps it would be a per-map option, so that it would only
> affect the maps that it needs to affect?
Caching is mostly a client feature. A client doesn't care what
tables a server is using.
Wietse
