Le 27/12/2012 04:05, Stan Hoeppner a écrit : > On 12/26/2012 6:19 PM, Noel Jones wrote: >> On 12/26/2012 4:52 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >>> On 12/24/2012 4:57 PM, Noel Jones wrote: >>> >>>> Opinions differ on psbl.surriel and barracudacentral, >>>> but they are frequently used in scoring rather than outright. A >>>> site listed on two of these three is likely spam, a site listed on >>>> only one of them is questionable. >>> Nonsense. The mere fact that a listing on one DNSBL is absent on others >> >> Glad it works for you at your sites, I use them too. >> >> As with all third-party blacklists (and whitelists!) each sysop >> should make their own decision about who to hand the keys to. When >> giving advice to others knowing next to nothing about their local >> policy, it would be foolish to be anything but conservative. > Yes, conservative. Note my last response in this thread which contained > this instruction with my scoring recommendation: test first >
unfortunately, testing isn't enough. things keep changing: - DNSBL listings change. - sites situation changes - new sites appear ... when I first tested BRBL, I found it safe for outright rejection. but this didn't last. I also added local rules, which worked for a long time, but many of these rules proved unsafe.
