I think you have a point there. Let's see what happens. Maybe later on I will use spamd to annoy the zombies found by postscreen. To keep the logfiles clean and for sadistic reasons. ;-)
BTW how can I read this dbase? ~% postmap -s btree:/var/spool/postfix/postscreen/db 1.2.3.4 1351857604;1351774804;1354363204;1354363204;1354363204;0 1.2.3.5 1351782475;1351699675;1354288075;1354288075;1354288075;0 1.2.3.6 1351718020;1351643615;1354223620;1354223620;1354223620;0 _LAST_CACHE_CLEANUP_COMPLETED_ 1351766276 The long numbers are epoch dates, the 0 at the end is? On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Jamie Paul Griffin <ja...@kode5.net> wrote: > / Wietse Venema wrote on Thu 1.Nov'12 at 7:48:44 -0400 / > > > Han Boetes: > > > After that postscreen gets to deal with whatever comes next. Now incase > > > postscreen decides that the ip is a zombie it's being blacklisted by > > > postscreen. In that case I'd like to hand the ip back to OpenBSD spamd. > > > > Good luck with that. I would not invest development time for such > > a rare use case. > > > > Wietse > > I use OpenBSD and decided to use either spamd or postscreen not both, > since they do pretty much the same thing. I would just use postscreen TBH > if you're using postfix. I think spamd is best used with sendmail in the > OpenBSD base installation since it lacks a postscreen-type feature. > -- # Han
