* Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> [2012-09-11 19:23 -0400]:
> Even if the local delivery agent rejected non-existent extensions,
> Postfix would still have to stop "invalid" addresses at the SMTP
> daemon to avoid becoming a backscatter source.

Indeed, that's what I am trying to assure (not becoming a backscatter
source, that is).

> <snips>
> 
> It does not grope around in user's home directories.

And that's what I was confirming, thanks!

* Noel Jones <njo...@megan.vbhcs.org> [2012-09-11 19:14 -0400]:
> Yes, this discussion is about stopping unwanted extensions at the SMTP
> daemon.
> 
> I fully agree stopping them after they've been accepted from the
> network (ie. bounce/DSN/discard them) is at best pointless, at worst
> will get you blacklisted.

Yep - I tried that in my early days of running an SMTP server, and got
sufficiently smacked not to do it again (it still stings! ;).

Regards, and thanks for the suggestions and reminders,
-- 
dave [ please don't CC me ]

Attachment: pgpfKd04zePCD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to