Ben, An issue I'm trying to solve - but never mind - I figured out a simpler way with transport maps.
Mike Durket On Aug 2, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Ben Rosengart wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 12:02:56PM -0700, Michael Durket wrote: >> I have a host (A) acting as an MX for host (B). Currently I do this via >> relay_domains and relay_recipient_maps. Is it possible to do this instead >> via virtual_domains and virtual_aliases? Or would a virtual_alias map entry >> on MX host A to forward user@B to user@B not work right (because the >> right-hand-side user@B would generate an MX lookup for B which would loop >> right back to host A)? > > Is there a problem you're trying to solve, or are you just curious? > > -- > Ben Rosengart "Like all those possessing a library, > Sendmail, Inc. Aurelian was aware that he was guilty of > +1 718 431 3822 not knowing his in its entirety [...]" > -- Jorge Luis Borges > > NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. > Sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. >
