Am 19.07.2012 13:36, schrieb M. Fioretti:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 10:13:36 AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> 
>>> so if it was a false positive, there won't be any copy whatsoever,
>>> anywhere on your server?
>>
>> well, we have days with 500000 spams log with the reason why it was
>> blocked is enough
> 
> but do your users get an excerpt of those logs with the
> subjects/senders of the spam addressed to them? Are you allowed to not
> give them any way whatsoever to find out that they "lost" some
> legitimate, but misclassified message before some angry customer calls
> asking why they did not answer?
> 
> I am not complaining, mind you. Just really curious.
> 
> Marco
> 

why not use i.e spamass milter
to block spam tagged mails during smtp income stage at defined value

man spamass-milter

-r nn   Reject scanned email if it greater than or equal to nn.  If -1,
reject scanned email if SpamAssassin tags it as spam (useful if you are
also using the -u flag,
             and users have changed their required_hits value).

this reduces spam tagged mail which you have to sort in users in users
mailbox junk folders in general

i.e if you flag spam about a level at 5 , all over level 10 should be no
problem get rejected, between 5-10 flag it only , beyond nothing happens

this method i legal in germany

also you might consider using clamav-milter with sanesecurity antispam
signatures, wich helps al lot here too
-- 
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer


Reply via email to