Am 09.07.2012 19:00, schrieb Bill Cole:
> On 9 Jul 2012, at 11:20, Curtis Maurand wrote:
> 
>> This has probably been asked in the past, but is it worth it to go through
>> the contortions to set up SPF?
> 
> On the sending side, the simple answer is "YES!"
> 
> There is a more complex and nuanced answer. There's a significant amount of 
> misunderstanding about the benefits SPF
> actually will yield (not much, for most sending domains) and about the 
> "contortions" required for it (again: for
> most domains a pragmatic SPF setup is trivial.) If you expect accurate SPF to 
> make everyone always accept your
> valid mail, you will be disappointed. 

correct but it helps

> If you expect to be able to safely use a "-all" tail on a record for a domain
> that is used on legit mail, you stand a strong chance of disappointment

why?

each new mail-user get instructions how to configure his mail-client
if he starts using the SMTP of his ISP against the instructions
HOPEFULLY his mails get rejected - if all mail-admins/companies
would act this way spammers life would be much harder

to setup proepr PF/TXT records is plain easy if you control
the nameservers and can be even fully automated


[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ dig spf thelounge.net @8.8.8.8

; <<>> DiG 9.9.1-P1-RedHat-9.9.1-2.P1.fc17 <<>> spf thelounge.net @8.8.8.8
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 24410
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;thelounge.net.                 IN      SPF

;; ANSWER SECTION:
thelounge.net.          86400   IN      SPF     "v=spf1 ip4:91.118.73.0/24 
ip4:89.207.144.27 -all"

[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ dig txt thelounge.net @8.8.8.8

; <<>> DiG 9.9.1-P1-RedHat-9.9.1-2.P1.fc17 <<>> txt thelounge.net @8.8.8.8
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 52158
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;thelounge.net.                 IN      TXT

;; ANSWER SECTION:
thelounge.net.          86400   IN      TXT     "v=spf1 ip4:91.118.73.0/24 
ip4:89.207.144.27 -all"




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to