Maxime Gaudreault:
> Jun 11 17:07:00 mx01 postfix/smtp[2003]: 61C50561039: to=<
> recipi...@domain.ca>, relay=192.168.100.9[192.168.100.9]:25,
> delay=3.4, delays=3.4/0/0/0, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0
> 4fd65e47-000321f5 Message accepted for delivery)
Wietse:
> This appears to be a real email message.
Maxime Gaudreault:
> from=<double-bou...@reference.qc.ca>, size=246, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> Jun 11 16:56:15 mx01 postfix/smtp[800]: 2093E56006D:
> to=<recipi...@domain.ca>, relay=192.168.100.9[192.168.100.9]:25,
> delay=0.01, delays=0/0/0/0, dsn=2.1.5, status=deliverable (250 2.1.5
> Recipient <recipi...@domain.ca> ok (local))
Wietse:
> This appears to be an "address verification" message.
>
> Both messages are routed via relay=192.168.100.9[192.168.100.9]:25.
> Why is one delivery "good", and one delivery "bad"?
Maxime Gaudreault:
> Bad delivery tries to send through 10.0.1.11 but verify the recipient
> with 192.168.100.9.
> 10.0.1.11 can't accept mail for this domain
The logfile evidence shows that BOTH ARE ROUTED VIA 192.168.100.9.
The REJECT message involving 10.0.1.11 comes from the address
verification CACHE. This CACHE uses historical information.
Apparently, you made some configuration error that has been
fixed in the meantime.
Wietse
