Am 30.05.2012 01:04, schrieb mouss: > Le 30/05/2012 00:06, Simon Brereton a écrit : >> On May 29, 2012 6:03 PM, "mouss" <mo...@ml.netoyen.net> wrote: >>> >>> Le 28/05/2012 09:53, Georg Schönweger a écrit : >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> i'm using a Newsreader to read this list (via news.gname.org). But afaik >>>> i have to be subscribed to write to this list. And if i'm subscribed i >>>> will receive every post via email too, so i receive it twice. >>>> Is there a way to be subscribed without "receving" posts to my mail >> address? >>> >>> no. almost all mailing lists work this way (posters = members = >>> recipients). believe it or not, many of us have considered this problem, >>> but it's not a simple one (open lists such as debian lists currently get >>> more abuse...). I personally worked on a much much simpler problem: N >>> persons in a company are subscribed to a single list: the company gets N >>> copies of the sames messages. would there be a way to get only one copy, >>> yet allow each person to post "individually"? my anwser so far is: live >>> with that (not even pruning N-1 messages, because it's harder than it >>> looks...). keep it simple... >>> >>> to fix your problem, get yourself an address that you don't consult, such >> as >>> gschoewgere.posto...@gmail.com >>> it's sub-optimal, but it's so simple. >> >> By default gmail doesn't show you your own post. >> >> Some mailing software doesn't either.. >> > > looks like you misread OP (I did at first). > the issue isn't with one own messages being resent. he gets the message > both on his email address via list re-post and on his news reader. > > (and gmail behaviour is subject to debate, some like it, some don't. but > this is not the right list for such debates). >
Thank you for the clarification! I will use now a "fake" address as suggested by you. kind regards, Georg
