On Feb 14, 2012, at 5:02 PM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:

> 
> On Feb 14, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Feb 14, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2/14/2012 8:45 AM, jeffrey j donovan wrote:
>>>> greetings
>>>> 
>>>> I have a couple of PPC 10.5 machines running as authenticated smtp relays. 
>>>> I upgraded postfix to 2.9.0 using macports.
>>>> 
>>>> I am running into a warning when I run postfix check.
>>>> 
>>>> /opt/local/sbin/postconf: warning: /opt/local/etc/postfix/main.cf: unused 
>>>> parameter: smtpd_use_pw_server=yes
>>>> /opt/local/sbin/postconf: warning: /opt/local/etc/postfix/main.cf: unused 
>>>> parameter: smtpd_pw_server_security_options=login,cram-md5
>>>> /opt/local/sbin/postconf: warning: /opt/local/etc/postfix/main.cf: unused 
>>>> parameter: enable_server_options=yes
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> these options were to access my local password server for authentication.  
>>>> Is there an alternate command ?
>>>> how do I get my users to authenticated without creating another password 
>>>> database ?
>>> 
>>> These are options that Apple patches into postfix, and looks as if
>>> they didn't fully patch 2.9.0 to make "postfix check" aware of the
>>> apple-specific parameters.
>> 
>> I'm not familiar with the macports versions but they are different from what 
>> Apple provides. Apple provided Postfix comes with Mac OS distributions and 
>> updates.
>> 
>> Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) is rather ancient these days but is the last version 
>> that runs on PPC (Power PC) systems. I have no way to check right now but 
>> what Apple would have been distributing then is Postfix 2.low. Even under 
>> 10.6 (Snow Leopard), I think it was a 2.4.x version.
>> 
>> Currently, with Mac OS X 10.7.3 (Lion), it's Postfix 2.8.4. No 2.9 from 
>> Apple yet (I'm currently running OS X 10.7.3 and Postfix 2.8.4 on my home 
>> server).
>> 
>>> You can safely ignore these warnings, and report the problem to your
>>> package provider.
>> 
>> 
>> The package provider for the 2.9 the OP is trying to run is macports but the 
>> parameters are specific to an Apple distributed version. Not really 
>> macports' problem. In one sense, switching from an Apple version of postfix 
>> to the macports version is the same as switching from another MTA to 
>> Postfix. While they're both called Postfix, one cannot just be dropped in in 
>> place of the other. I think the OP needs to figure out how the macports 
>> version handles authentication.
>> 
> 
> thanks to all replied.
> 
> Larry hit the nail. i need to find out how macports handles authentication.

$ man port

$ port variants postfix
postfix has the variants:
   dovecot_sasl: add Dovecot SASL support
   ldap: add ldap support via openldap
   mysql5: add mysql support via mysql5
   pcre: add pcre support
   postgresql83: add postgresql support via postgresql83
     * conflicts with postgresql84 postgresql90 postgresql91
   postgresql84: add postgresql support via postgresql84
     * conflicts with postgresql83 postgresql90 postgresql91
   postgresql90: add postgresql support via postgresql90
     * conflicts with postgresql83 postgresql84 postgresql91
   postgresql91: add postgresql support via postgresql91
     * conflicts with postgresql83 postgresql84 postgresql90
   sasl: add sasl support via cyrus-sasl2
   tls: add tls support via openssl
   universal: Build for multiple architectures

Regards,
Bradley Giesbrecht

Reply via email to