Am 12.02.2012 21:21, schrieb Alex Bligh: > A server I run (let's say mail.example.com) inserts a mail header > similar to the one below, when it receives mail either via normal > SMTP from another MTA, or when it receives mail from an authenticated > MUA. > > Received: from [10.10.10.10] (1.1.200.192.example.com [192.200.1.1]) > by mail.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAAAAAAAA; > Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:54:19 +0000 (GMT) > > In this example, 10.10.10.10 is behind a NAT, the external IP > address being 192.200.1.1. > > In the case of authenticated MUA submissions (only) I do not want to > leak the actual IP address - in fact I'd prefer not to put any "from" > information in at all. I think I need a Received: line still. > > I don't want to remove this for mail from other MTAs which do not > authenticate.
any other reason as making debugging more complicated? for me it is and was always one of the most important informations if anybody complains about problems and i rqeuest the full headrs to see really the whole way the message was gone and as example it makes a hughe difference if someone submits from his LAN client or using webmail to start debugging
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
