Am 27.01.2012 15:42, schrieb Matteo Cazzador: > Yes this point is solved for me, the several problem > is about imap cluster structure. > > Il 27/01/2012 15:20, jeffrey j donovan ha scritto: >> On Jan 27, 2012, at 8:52 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> >>> Matteo Cazzador: >>>> Hello, i'va a particular question about mail server. >>>> Suppose a customer have more than one locations >>>> in different geographic sites, each one with a mail server with the >>>> same >>>> domain. >>> Suppose all email addresses have the form "u...@example.com", that >>> the company has two locations site-a and site-b, and that the mail >>> servers are mail.site-a.example.com and mail.site-b.example.com. >>> >>> There is no need to deliver every email message to every mail server. >>> Instead, you set up one virtual alias for every user: >>> >>> us...@example.com us...@mail.site-a.example.com >>> us...@example.com us...@mail.site-a.example.com >>> us...@example.com us...@mail.site-b.example.com >>> >>> user1 will receive all their mail on mail.site-a.example.com, and >>> will read all their mail there. >>> >>> There is no need for complex synchronization protocols. Instead, >>> you use SMTP to deliver mail to the right server. >>> >>> Wietse >> sorry to thread jump, >> >> weiste, is it more efficient in this case to run a virtual alias over >> a transport map ? does one way out perform another ? >> >> i have a simliar scenario but i use a transport map. >> -j >
please dont top post, ask on dovecot list about imap , better look dovecot list archives for some examples -- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Germany/Munich/Bavaria
