Duane, I am not using sender restrictions right now, but I can implement it.

Ralf, can you please tell me a method to append incremental numbers at the
end of each line? I need to do it as you pointed out.
I was searching for the same, but could not find out something that exactly
does what I need. Sorry for asking this in this group, but my skills in
this matter are rather limited.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Duane Hill <duih...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 at 11:58:31 UTC, 
> dnsingh.dns@gmail.comconfabulated:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt <
> > ralf.hildebra...@charite.de> wrote:
>
> >> * DN Singh <dnsingh....@gmail.com>:
> >> > Hello Group,
> >> >
> >> > I have configured some rejection domains in postfix access file,
> where it
> >> > rejects bad domains, or domains that do not exist. This list has been
> >> > gradually developed over time. A weird behavior happened the last
> time I
> >> > updated it. I had added some typos/bad domains that I found from the
> >> logs,
> >> > and appended it to the access file. After this, it started rejecting
> all
> >> > mails to "yahoo.co.in" specifically. I searched the file for the
> text,
> >> but
> >> > could not find it.
> >> > The file has following lines containing "yahoo.co.in" (I have grepped
> >> it.)
> >>
> >> Use REJECT unique number
> >> instead of just REJECT to find out which rule is firing.
> >>
> >> Also, why don't you simply use reject_unknown_sender_domain?
> >>
> > Thanks for pointing out about the unique number, Ralf. I'll do that to
> find
> > the line.
>
> > Also, these are recipient domains, and I am already using
> > reject_unknown_recipient_domain parameter in
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions,
> > but it does not reject these domains. This is why I have to do this
> > manually.
>
> Ralf  stated reject_unknown_sender_domain. I did not find that in your
> postconf below.
>
> > Any reason for the check not happening?? My postconf -n output:
>
> > --------------------------------------
> > alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
> > alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
> > bounce_queue_lifetime = 0
> > broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
> > command_directory = /usr/sbin
> > config_directory = /etc/postfix
> > daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
> > data_directory = /var/lib/postfix
> > debug_peer_level = 2
> > default_destination_concurrency_limit = 20
> > disable_vrfy_command = yes
> > home_mailbox = Maildir/
> > html_directory = no
> > in_flow_delay = 1s
> > inet_interfaces = all
> > inet_protocols = all
> > mail_owner = postfix
> > mailq_path = /usr/bin/mailq.postfix
> > manpage_directory = /usr/share/man
> > maximal_queue_lifetime = 1d
> > mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost
> > mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8
> > newaliases_path = /usr/bin/newaliases.postfix
> > qmgr_clog_warn_time = 0
> > qmgr_message_active_limit = 20000
> > queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix
> > queue_run_delay = 300s
> > readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.8.7/README_FILES
> > sample_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.8.7/samples
> > sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail.postfix
> > setgid_group = postdrop
> > smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasldb2
> > smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated
> > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_rhsbl_recipient rhsbl.sorbs.net,
> > reject_rhsbl_recipient bogusmx.rfc-ignorant.org,
> > reject_unknown_recipient_domain, permit_sasl_authenticated,
> > permit_mynetworks, permit_inet_interfaces, reject_unauth_destination,
> > reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
> > smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
> > smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header = no
> > smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_recipient_access
> > hash:/etc/postfix/access, permit_mynetworks,
> reject_sender_login_mismatch,
> > permit_sasl_authenticated
> > transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
> > unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
> > ----------------------------------------
>
>
>
> --
> If at first you don't succeed...
> ...so much for skydiving.
>
>

Reply via email to