Confirm fixed in the 20120110 snapshot.
Thanks!
-- Noel Jones
On 1/10/2012 6:05 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Noel Jones:
>> I notice after installing postfix-2.9-20120108 I get thousands of
>> log entries such as (valid username redacted)
>>
>> Jan 10 16:54:09 mgate3 postfix/verify[57527]:
>> dict_memcache_sequence: /etc/postfix/maps/memcache_verify.cf: key
>> "u...@example.org" => 0:0:1325186726:250 ok its for <u...@example.org>
>>
>> and
>>
>> Jan 10 14:58:46 mgate3 postfix/postscreen[33675]:
>> dict_memcache_sequence:
>> /etc/postfix/maps/memcache_postscreen_cache.cf: key "98.139.91.98"
>> => 1325955071;1325872271;1;1;1;0
>>
>>
>> I didn't get these with the previous snapshot. Did I screw
>> something up or are these just left-over development messages?
>
> There's a missing "if (msg_verbose)" before line 466. I didn't notice
> this because cache scans happen only a few times a day.
>
> Wietse
>
> 464 } else {
> 465 seq_res = backup->sequence(backup, function, key, value);
> 466 msg_info("%s: %s: key \"%s\" => %s",
> 467 myname, dict_mc->dict.name, *key ? *key : "(not
> found)",
> 468 *value ? *value : backup->error ? "(backup error)" :
> 469 "(not found)");
> 470 DICT_ERR_VAL_RETURN(dict, backup->error, seq_res);
> 471 }
>
