On 22/12/11 05:07, Reindl Harald wrote: > On 21.12.2011 15:56, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >> The real solution is not misuse the "nore...@example.com" *header* >> address as an envelope sender address. >> >> The envelope sender, especially for no-reply automatically generated >> email, must be a valid mailbox that is capable of receiving and >> acting on non-delivery reports (bounces). > > have fun getting blacklisted by bounce mails to the noreply-address > which are spam using a spoofed sender of an existent person!
Huh? You're talking about backscatter, which makes no sense here. Viktor was talking about being able to *receive* bounces, not about sending them. Peter
