* Wietse Venema <postfix-users@postfix.org>: > Wietse Venema: > > Mueller, Martin (Messaging): > > > Thanks for all the work making memcache support available, any > > > thoughts on the potential use of this for anvil? > > > > As documented, anvil blocks a client that overwhelms the server. > > For that, there is no need to maintain state over more than a few > > minutes. The program can be kept small and stupid, and it is not > > the end of the world when it loses state after "postfix reload". > > Perhaps a better question would be "using memcache instead of anvil", > and using the same mechanism for other Postfix daemons to dump some > counters. That would use a different interface than (lookup, update, > delete and first/next), more something like (increment, decrement, > or reset).
At the risk of getting flamed: Use it for SNMP? p@rick -- All technical questions asked privately will be automatically answered on the list and archived for public access unless privacy is explicitely required and justified. saslfinger (debugging SMTP AUTH): <http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/>
