On 2011-12-09 11:25 AM, Grant <emailgr...@gmail.com> wrote:
It was also repeatedly suggested that I switch to exactly the arrangement that I've switched to.
No, that was only presented as an option (there is always more than one way to skin a cat).
Doing it the way you did it makes your primary submission port *less* secure, *just* so you can let squirrelmail use it instead of leaving 465 open *only* for squirrelmail.
But... to each his own... -- Best regards, Charles
