Wietse Venema: > > >> Note #11. Does this mean this is still valid, or that the docs need > > >> changing? > > > #11 is valid ONLY IF #2 exists. Without #2 it is a non-existent > > > parameter. > > > > > > Wietse > > > > > yes sir, #2 does exist in my case... > > Why don't you show the real evidence, instead of your anonymized version.
Well, I tested this at some point. I'll see what change has broken it.
Wietse
