On 10/28/2011 02:23 PM, James Seymour wrote: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:17:12 +0200 > [email protected] wrote: > >> Hi all, > [snip] >> >> I read about mailgraph and pflogsumm but these stats are not >> as detailed as i try to have. > > You want *more* detail than Pflogsumm gives? Wow. Most people have > been pestering me to *reduce* it. > > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:01:48 -0500 > Stan Hoeppner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You may want to try logwatch as >> well since it's still actively developed/supported, whereas pflogsumm >> is not, IIRC. >> > > It hasn't actually *needed* active development for a while, as far as I > know. I address bug reports as they come up. I do have a new version > that's been waiting for me to push it out for a while. So, depending > upon how you define "actively": You may or may not be correct ;) > > Somebody recently asked if I wanted a patch to support postscreen, but > I've been too busy/distracted to even reply to him, yet.
First of all, thank you for this great piece of software that is very useful. If you ever consider to add postscreen support one day, that would be even better. I'm sure that would please many folks, me first :) Simon
