Am 30.09.2011 18:23, schrieb ajm:
> 
> 
> If pix workarounds are out of question, I think just DNS remains.
> 
> On DNS I have currently:
> 
> nslookup -query=MX domain  - returns only an MX_server - the correct one
> nslookup MX_server   - returns the correct ip address
> nslookup ip_address    - returns the name of a machine from the same
> domain, but not the MX_server.
> 
> Even if the reverse resolution does not point to exactly the same name
> (there are CNAMEs), it resolves to the same domain.
> I thought it would be enough, as I did never need more than this before,
> but then this is probably the problem.
> 
> Thank you for your help!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:15:07 -0500, Noel Jones <njo...@megan.vbhcs.org>
> wrote:
>> On 9/30/2011 10:49 AM, ajm wrote:
>>> Hello! 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> I recently installed a new mail server with postfix 2.8.2. This
>>> machine replaced an older one, with nearly the same features and
>>> configurations. 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Since that, however, I'm experimenting problems to send emails to
>>> only one destination. Logs show: 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Sep 28 18:51:27 mailserver postfix/smtp[21279]: 3418C61EE1: enabling
>>> PIX workarounds: disable_esmtp delay_dotcrlf for
>>> oa.pt[213.146.196.92]:25 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Sep 28 18:51:47 mailserver postfix/smtp[21279]:
>>> 3418C61EE1: to=<x...@adv.oa.pt>, relay=oa.pt[213.146.196.92]:25,
>>> delay=3207, delays=3167/0/20/20, dsn=4.0.0, status=deferred (host
>>> oa.pt[213.146.196.92] said: 421 DNS temporary failure at return MX
>>> check, try again later (#4.3.0) (in reply to MAIL FROM command))  
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> I started checking for DNS problems. Everything seems to be correct,
>>> both A and MX records, as well as reverse resolution. 
>>>
>>> I already tried to disable pix workarounds, as older version didn't
>>> have this feature and worked well, but there were no changes in
>>> results.  Can somebody please help me on this subject?  
>>>
>>>  
>>
>> The server at 213.146.196.92 is refusing your mail; only they can
>> give you an authoritative answer why.
>>
>> From the message returned, I assume they are doing an MX lookup on
>> the MAIL FROM domain, and that lookup fails.  This doesn't have
>> anything to do with the pix workarounds.
>>
>>
>>   -- Noel Jones

dont top post
use dig for lookups
better with real world examples
mx entries in dns are no secrets

after all i think your question was allready answered by Noel

-- 
Best Regards

MfG Robert Schetterer

Germany/Munich/Bavaria

Reply via email to