On 7/9/2011 10:10 AM, Christoph Scheurer wrote: > Hello, > > I have a mail server with postfix 2.5.5 (Debian lenny) which is serving mail > forwarding domains as described in VIRTUAL_README.html without any problems. > The respective part in main.cf contains (domain name removed): > virtual_alias_domains = xxxx > virtual_alias_maps = cdb:/etc/postfix/virtual > > Now I had to set up a SASL-authenticated (just using sasldb) submission > instance on that server on a non-standard port (25025) for a couple of users. > The respective section in master.cf then reads like this: > > smtp inet n - - - - smtpd > 25025 inet n - - - - smtpd > -o smtpd_tls_auth_only=no > -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes > -o smtpd_sasl_security_options=noanonymous,noplaintext > -o smtpd_sasl_local_domain=xxxx > -o broken_sasl_auth_clients=yes > -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject > -o > smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject_unauth_destination > -o content_filter= > > With this the standard mail server still works like before and ESMTPA relaying > for the authenticated users also works like expected but for one case: it > bounces for recipients with addresses in the virtual forwarding domains which > should be handled (i.e. mapped) by the server itself. > > I have tried to add the virtual_alias_domains and virtual_alias_maps settings > explicitly via "-o" overwrites to the 25025 service in master.cf, but to no > avail. Turning on verbose messages with "-v" on the 25025 smtpd shows in the > logs that this smtpd is able to correctly resolve the virtual names in the > section > > >>> CHECKING RECIPIENT MAPS <<< > ... > postfix/smtpd[11296]: maps_find: virtual_alias_maps: > cdb:/etc/postfix/virtual(0,lock|fold_fix): test@xxxx = test@yyyy > postfix/smtpd[11296]: mail_addr_find: test@xxxx -> test@yyyy > > but mail to the address test@xxxx still bounces if submitted via the smtpd > on port 25025 while at the same time it is successfully delivered if injected > via the standard smtpd. > > I assumed that for the 25025 smtpd anything which is not overwritten with "-o" > in master.cf is exactly the same as defined in main.cf, but obviously I must > be missing something here. Any hint as to what it is is highly appreciated. > > Kind regards, > > Ch. Scheurer >
Please show us "postconf -n" output, all non-comment lines from main.cf, and non-verbose logs illustrating the problem. -- Noel Jones
