On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 04:48:44 -0700 (PDT) Charlie Orford articulated: > unverified_recipient_tempfail_action = permit would have solved this > problem with the small penalty of a brief period of potential > backscatter.
The "potential backscatter" is enough to turn me off on the proposal. Now, if you could develop something that did not involve that problem then I think it might be given a warmer welcome by the community. Then again, that is my own 2¢ on the matter. -- Jerry ✌ postfix-u...@seibercom.net _____________________________________________________________________ TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html