On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 04:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Charlie Orford articulated:

> unverified_recipient_tempfail_action = permit  would have solved this
> problem with the small penalty of a brief period of potential
> backscatter.

The "potential backscatter" is enough to turn me off on the proposal.
Now, if you could develop something that did not involve that problem
then I think it might be given a warmer welcome by the community. Then
again, that is my own 2¢ on the matter.

-- 
Jerry ✌
postfix-u...@seibercom.net
_____________________________________________________________________
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
TO (UN)SUBSCRIBE see http://www.postfix.org/lists.html

Reply via email to